Starting the Conversation (In Absentia) – Part 4

A woman I’ll call Paula joined her church in an urban neighborhood in the 70’s.  But as the demographics changed over time, church attendance declined.  What had once been a church of 300 members shrunk to about 50 worshippers in the 2000’s. 

 It wasn’t just demographic change that led to the decline.  Paula perceived a deep lack of trust among the membership.  While some leaders tried to be open in their communication, others enforced an atmosphere of quiet resistance.  “It was impossible to have open conversations about what to do.  You always felt like people didn’t trust you.”  Whenever change was introduced, a contingent of older leaders could be counted on to cross their arms and say “No.”  Paula often felt like she didn’t belong, but she kept trying to bring new ideas to the table. 

 Even as the atmosphere in the church got heavier, many people were unwilling to acknowledge they were dying.  Meetings were held to discuss the situation. 

 “Closure was brought up a couple times in thoughtful ways, looking at the facts, and (the conversation) was just shut down,” she says. 

 Finally, Paula did “the hardest thing I ever did in my life.”  She stood up at a congregational meeting and announced she was leaving the church.  She openly gave her reasons, and suggested people talk to her about it if they wanted.  She promised to stay on for a couple more months to orient others to her volunteer roles.  “I need to do this for me,” she told them.  “So many people just disappear when they leave a church.  I wanted to be more open and intentional about it.” 

No one asked her about her decision.  Some people just avoided her altogether.

 Not long after that, the pastor also announced his departure.  Then the choir director and council president resigned.  Each leader who left openly articulated their reasons.  Paula now says the departure of these key leaders was an important turning point.    Within less than a year, the church had closed its doors. 

 While it is usually beneficial for a group to stick together through tough times, some congregational systems may display increased dysfunction and denial in their last days.  Are all the members obligated by loyalty to stay until the end?   My answer would be no.  

 A community mired in dysfunction can no longer be the seedbed of healthy discipleship.  In this case, faithful Christians may need to seek a new community.  If a departure is carried out respectfully and honestly, it can be an act of self-differentiation that helps others decide where they stand and what they wish to fight for. 

 Maybe you are tempted to just “slip away” without saying anything, to prevent hurting people’s feelings.  If you do that, you leave a hole, not only of your personhood and spiritual gifts, but of your insights and feelings that the congregation could learn from. 

 If you are considering leaving a church that is in decline, make a list of your reasons and consider whether your action is leading you toward Christ, or away.  If people in the church have hurt you, is revenge a part of your decision?  And where are you going from here?  What kind of faith community do you need?  What kind of church needs you?  And what spiritual gifts have been nurtured in your old church that will be used in your new one? 

 Maybe you are thinking, “Oh, I could never leave.  The church would fall apart without me.”  Think again.  The Church is God’s project.  Not yours.

2 responses to “Starting the Conversation (In Absentia) – Part 4

  1. Martin Toepke-Floyd

    Something similar has happened in our church during a council meeting. A key couple spoke openly about leaving and they have carried through with it. We had had several straw polls about closing, and they were talking to me privately for a couple of years, and then decided when others kept sitting on the fence. We have an official vote scheduled on whether or not and when to close in two weeks. That couple are still members, but attend another church most Sundays, though I expect them to be there for the vote.

  2. So maybe there are different levels of involvement people can choose in a church at this stage. I knew of a member who started worshiping elsewhere, but continued to pledge to her old church because of support for them. Another story I heard today was about a church in the process of discernment about closure. The younger families said to the governing board, “We will stay and help you with discernment, but eventually our children need a place to learn about their faith where there are other young families.” The only problem I see is when people leave the church to “meet their needs” elsewhere and then try to come back and wield their influence when hard decisions need to be made. Is this fair to those who have stayed around to have the tough conversations?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s